(Although we have a few comments to make regarding the film as a whole the majority of this review will be dedicated to the story’s adaptation from page to screen.)
Gavin Hood’s Ender's Game takes a science fiction classic and visualizes it with dazzling realism and originality. The opening is rough and plagued by hokey dialogue but as the story progresses it gradually comes into its own, culminating in arguably the most breathtaking climactic end battle in all of science fiction to date, although the penultimate battle scenes leading up the climax feel truncated, making the third act feel rushed. Asa Butterfield (the principal lead) delivers a performance that becomes increasingly impressive as the film progresses.
As both writer and director, Hood impressively adapts difficult material to the silver screen, improving notable segments from the book such as the battle school sequence and simulated battles, and correlating Mazer Rackham’s final battle with Ender’s active progress during the course of the main plot.
However, some adaptation decisions were more poorly chosen, such as the near total absence of Ender's older brother, Peter, who features so prominently in terms of theme and character development (for Ender) but is almost completely absent from the film, despite his being referenced often. As written, the character of Peter should have been omitted altogether to prevent unnecessary dilution of the plot. Also the psychologist character whose presence remains strong throughout the story is so poorly written and spouts redundant dialogue and concepts that are not illustrated in the film, especially earlier in the portions. So much more could have been done with the character to both expand and draw out Ender's character but very little is ever utilized. The character ends up as a bloated element of fat filled with hot air.
Ender's Game's greatest weakness is its botched final reveal. By showing an additional point of view (an excellent adaptation choice) the filmmaker expands on the world of the story but presents the new information in a way that prematurely gives away the ending, thereby lessening the potential impact of one of the greatest reveals in science fiction history.
Despite its shortcomings, Ender’s Game is an enjoyable cinematic journey through an original world tantalizing to viewers who are fans of science fiction. Ender’s Game was adapted from the widely known novel of the same name by Orson Scott Card.
Rating: 3.5 / 5
Compact all-encompassing reviews from a storyteller's perspective which examine structure, execution, technical and spectacle in a brief, efficient format.
Showing posts with label likes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label likes. Show all posts
Tuesday, January 28, 2014
Tuesday, November 12, 2013
Star Trek: Into Darkness, a film by J.J. Abrams
J.J. Abrams’s long anticipated sequel Star Trek: Into Darkness outdoes its predecessor in action, intensity and spectacle. Despite a running time of 2:12 (132 min) the film feels a little too short to play out the struggle between the protagonists and the main antagonist, played by Benedict Cumberbatch. The saturation of fan service and cross-references to other events in the Star Trek universe is an unending treat for fans of the franchise but at times detrimental, especially when it results in lines of hokey dialogue. A simple substitution of one of the film’s mindless action scenes for a short sequence to deepen character and theme development would have greatly benefited Into Darkness.
The first Star Trek took us with surprise by the acting intensity portrayed by its young cast. Into Darkness retains the same cast but fails to carry over the compelling emotional punch from its prequel. Part of this failure results from the from the disappointing script characterization of several cast members, namely Kirk, Spock, and Uhura. Benedict Cumberbatch proves the exception to this rule in his portrayal of the notorious Khan.
The biggest issue in Into Darkness is with the main antagonist, Khan. As one of the most intelligent and complex characters in the Star Trek Universe, more story and screen time oriented toward exploring the character’s intricacies is required in order for his personal journey to feel complete by the conclusion of his story arc. Instead of actually exploring the character, the story turns him into a 1-dimensional foe with no further development beyond the mid-point—a sad misappropriation of story potential. Much more could have been made of his shifting ally/enemy role as well but the film took the easy way out with his character, thereby losing both strength and depth as a result.
One of the most exciting films of the 2010s.
Rating: 3.5 / 5

The biggest issue in Into Darkness is with the main antagonist, Khan. As one of the most intelligent and complex characters in the Star Trek Universe, more story and screen time oriented toward exploring the character’s intricacies is required in order for his personal journey to feel complete by the conclusion of his story arc. Instead of actually exploring the character, the story turns him into a 1-dimensional foe with no further development beyond the mid-point—a sad misappropriation of story potential. Much more could have been made of his shifting ally/enemy role as well but the film took the easy way out with his character, thereby losing both strength and depth as a result.
One of the most exciting films of the 2010s.
Rating: 3.5 / 5
Monday, October 14, 2013
Starship Troopers, a sci-fi novel by Robert A. Heinlein
A nearly forgotten military sci-fi classic by author Robert A. Heinlein, Starship Troopers pushes science fiction beyond the commonplace genre novel toward the realm of literary fiction and its penchant for universal truth. By setting the story in a futuristic fictional setting, the author disassociates the book with any specific real-world war, allowing him to focus on a thorough examination of theme and moral philosophy.
Part science fiction novel, part moral essay, Starship Troopers devotes considerable time to philosophizing about the role of the soldier, the military, and the obligations of individuals in a collective society, especially to their fellow man. Drawing from the author’s own experience in the Armed Forces, Heinlein uses his well thought-out universe to constructively criticize the faults of American society through the eyes of a militaristic fascist one.
The novel’s thematic backbone creates a solid skeleton through which to elegantly explore the psychology of the soldier, specifically the infantryman, as he graduates through the various phases of his career from pre-enlisted civilian through mature officer. Heinlein also explores adjacent branches of this theme tree, including the developing relationship between master and student, commander and enlisted man, and father and son. With each new step toward maturity the protagonist sees the military machine with greater discernment and understanding (the military organization being a thematic substitute for ‘the world’ because in this case the military is the protagonist’s world).
Despite being published in 1959, Starship Troopers provides the experience of reading a novel written 10 or 20 years later than its actual publication date. Unfortunately, the dated dialogue continually bursts this illusion, ever reminding us that the novel was written in the 1950s. An over-use of unnecessary dialogue hedges such as “Uh” and “Umm” at the beginning of character responses slows the pace of many scenes and takes the reader out of the world of the story.
Readers expecting heart pumping action and thrilling space battles will be sorely disappointed in Starship Troopers. Heinlein deliberately steers clear of these tropes by means of the anti-“war genre” (e.g., anti-genre) to maintain focus on his themes and the insightful exposure of a combat soldier’s psychological journey. Despite the agedness of the book, many of his philosophical ideas remain universally valid to this day.
Starship Troopers was adapted for the big screen in 1997 by writer Edward Neumeier and director Paul Verhoeven.
Rating: 4.5 / 5
Part science fiction novel, part moral essay, Starship Troopers devotes considerable time to philosophizing about the role of the soldier, the military, and the obligations of individuals in a collective society, especially to their fellow man. Drawing from the author’s own experience in the Armed Forces, Heinlein uses his well thought-out universe to constructively criticize the faults of American society through the eyes of a militaristic fascist one.
The novel’s thematic backbone creates a solid skeleton through which to elegantly explore the psychology of the soldier, specifically the infantryman, as he graduates through the various phases of his career from pre-enlisted civilian through mature officer. Heinlein also explores adjacent branches of this theme tree, including the developing relationship between master and student, commander and enlisted man, and father and son. With each new step toward maturity the protagonist sees the military machine with greater discernment and understanding (the military organization being a thematic substitute for ‘the world’ because in this case the military is the protagonist’s world).
Despite being published in 1959, Starship Troopers provides the experience of reading a novel written 10 or 20 years later than its actual publication date. Unfortunately, the dated dialogue continually bursts this illusion, ever reminding us that the novel was written in the 1950s. An over-use of unnecessary dialogue hedges such as “Uh” and “Umm” at the beginning of character responses slows the pace of many scenes and takes the reader out of the world of the story.
Readers expecting heart pumping action and thrilling space battles will be sorely disappointed in Starship Troopers. Heinlein deliberately steers clear of these tropes by means of the anti-“war genre” (e.g., anti-genre) to maintain focus on his themes and the insightful exposure of a combat soldier’s psychological journey. Despite the agedness of the book, many of his philosophical ideas remain universally valid to this day.
Starship Troopers was adapted for the big screen in 1997 by writer Edward Neumeier and director Paul Verhoeven.
Rating: 4.5 / 5
Thursday, May 16, 2013
Suspiria, a horror film by Dario Argento
Dario Argento’s classic Suspiria is one of the highlights from the golden age of the 1970s horror genre.
Intense in every sense of the word, Argento’s film is violent, visually vibrant and surreal with an alarmingly ear-grating soundtrack intentionally designed to set the audience’s nerves on edge. Be prepared for an experience that is both oddly immersive and abrasive to the senses.
The lighting, set design and shot composition are more the stars of this film than the doe-eyed lead, played by Jessica Harper, who merely drifts from one scene to the next as if led by an invisible hand.
The film’s vibrant visuals are just enough to counterbalance a feeble, sometimes nonsensical story and nonexistent character development. Some of its colorful dream-like qualities and childish dialogue make more sense when the viewer understands that portions of the film were inspired by the dreams of co-writer Daria Nicolodi, and that the script originally intended for the protagonist and her classmates to be no older than 12, but neither excuse a weak story.
Suspiria is a stunning film like no other, so be sure to put it in your canon of “must-sees” for cinematographers, art designers, filmmakers and horror buffs alongside other visually salient works like Roman Polanski’s Repulsion.
Rating: 3 / 5
Intense in every sense of the word, Argento’s film is violent, visually vibrant and surreal with an alarmingly ear-grating soundtrack intentionally designed to set the audience’s nerves on edge. Be prepared for an experience that is both oddly immersive and abrasive to the senses.

The film’s vibrant visuals are just enough to counterbalance a feeble, sometimes nonsensical story and nonexistent character development. Some of its colorful dream-like qualities and childish dialogue make more sense when the viewer understands that portions of the film were inspired by the dreams of co-writer Daria Nicolodi, and that the script originally intended for the protagonist and her classmates to be no older than 12, but neither excuse a weak story.
Suspiria is a stunning film like no other, so be sure to put it in your canon of “must-sees” for cinematographers, art designers, filmmakers and horror buffs alongside other visually salient works like Roman Polanski’s Repulsion.
Rating: 3 / 5
Monday, March 4, 2013
Get the Gringo, a film by Adrian Grunberg
By James Gilmore
Adrian Grunberg’s gritty tough-guy film, Get the Gringo, is a wry tongue-in-cheek action crime drama with an edgy but resourceful troublemaker for a protagonist. He is proactive and refreshingly clever, a guy who only looks out for himself in world where everyone is corrupt and everyone is out to get him.
Colorful in texture, tone and visuals, Gringo creates a palatable experience for the audience free from the dictatorial confines of the mainstream Hollywood studio system, as is evident in some of its more taboo elements and several touches of brutal violence. Characters grow out of the naturally developing, organic plotline and are inseparable from this well-told story.
Some viewers may find parts of the third act low on the believability scale but overall Gringo’s storytelling flaws are minimal.
Although the film may not aspire to deep philosophical pondering the film fulfills its goal as a solid piece of entertainment. If you are in the mood for a Friday night flick that is refreshing, stimulating and all-around entertaining, give Get the Gringo a try.
Rating: 3.5 / 5
Adrian Grunberg’s gritty tough-guy film, Get the Gringo, is a wry tongue-in-cheek action crime drama with an edgy but resourceful troublemaker for a protagonist. He is proactive and refreshingly clever, a guy who only looks out for himself in world where everyone is corrupt and everyone is out to get him.
Colorful in texture, tone and visuals, Gringo creates a palatable experience for the audience free from the dictatorial confines of the mainstream Hollywood studio system, as is evident in some of its more taboo elements and several touches of brutal violence. Characters grow out of the naturally developing, organic plotline and are inseparable from this well-told story.
Some viewers may find parts of the third act low on the believability scale but overall Gringo’s storytelling flaws are minimal.
Although the film may not aspire to deep philosophical pondering the film fulfills its goal as a solid piece of entertainment. If you are in the mood for a Friday night flick that is refreshing, stimulating and all-around entertaining, give Get the Gringo a try.
Rating: 3.5 / 5
Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Act of Valor, a film by Mike McCoy and Scott Waugh
By James Gilmore
Act of Valor is a ballad of the unsung heroic deeds of Navy SEALs in clandestine operations.
Although neatly structured the film feels less like a coherent story than a series of military reenactments with a few specks of story spliced in between action sequences. Valor is generously laden with fan service for military aficionados, but at times the ultra realistic use of military jargon crosses the line from necessity to extraneous masturbation. Action sequences deliver impressive intensity and speed while skillful POV camerawork immerses the audience inside each mission, lending a sort of video game feel to the advancement of the plot.
The acting is as wooden as it gets and not just in terms of line delivery—no surprise, considering the principal characters are played by real Navy SEALs and not professional actors. Unfortunately this means that emotional tangibility with the main characters is difficult to establish, even with the repeated use of artificial filmic constructs employed to build personal empathy.
Actor Jason Cottle’s uncanny intensity makes his performance stand out among the cast.
If Act of Valor teaches us anything, it’s that “actual” does not equal “dramatic.” For a stellar example of how dramatizing reality improves its filmic qualities, see Seal Team Six: The Raid on Osama bin Laden. In spite of its painful dialogue and feeble plot, Act of Valor is a realistic, tense experience that military and action enthusiasts will love.
Rating: 3 / 5
Act of Valor is a ballad of the unsung heroic deeds of Navy SEALs in clandestine operations.
Although neatly structured the film feels less like a coherent story than a series of military reenactments with a few specks of story spliced in between action sequences. Valor is generously laden with fan service for military aficionados, but at times the ultra realistic use of military jargon crosses the line from necessity to extraneous masturbation. Action sequences deliver impressive intensity and speed while skillful POV camerawork immerses the audience inside each mission, lending a sort of video game feel to the advancement of the plot.
The acting is as wooden as it gets and not just in terms of line delivery—no surprise, considering the principal characters are played by real Navy SEALs and not professional actors. Unfortunately this means that emotional tangibility with the main characters is difficult to establish, even with the repeated use of artificial filmic constructs employed to build personal empathy.
Actor Jason Cottle’s uncanny intensity makes his performance stand out among the cast.
If Act of Valor teaches us anything, it’s that “actual” does not equal “dramatic.” For a stellar example of how dramatizing reality improves its filmic qualities, see Seal Team Six: The Raid on Osama bin Laden. In spite of its painful dialogue and feeble plot, Act of Valor is a realistic, tense experience that military and action enthusiasts will love.
Rating: 3 / 5
Friday, November 16, 2012
Battle Royale, a film by Kinji Fukasaku
by James Gilmore
Before the Hunger Games (2012) there was a grossly popular Japanese film by director Kinji Fukasaku called Battle Royale (2000).
Delivered in typical overdramatic Japanese style, Battle Royale is unlike any film known in Western cinema. Fukasaku blends beauty and brutality as we witness the innocence of youth corrupted with the ultimate need for survival, kill or be killed. With a death (or two) in every scene, this rapidly-paced narrative holds the sanctity of life as forfeit for each and every one of its multitudinous characters, who attempt a surprising array of tactics to kill, survive, or thwart the system in which they are trapped. All the social mores and pretensions of junior high school are replaced by love, loyalty, and raw fight-or-flight animal instinct.
The gems in this story are its intelligently characterized inhabitants, especially the teacher-turned-gamesmaster, Kitano-sensei. Through his character we see tragic, jaded adults devouring the lives of unblemished youth, especially the main characters, Shuya Nanahara and Noriko Nakagawa, previously ignorant of the horrors of adulthood and disappointment.
Battle Royale’s plot fails to pursue a few red herrings which warrant further development, although this failure does not hinder the plot much, mostly because their elaboration would impinge on the rigorous pacing of the main story.
Although the over-the-top acting may be a turnoff to some, if you approach Kinji Fukasaku’s Battle Royale with open mind, it may just surprise you with its juxtaposition of tenderness and violence, desperation and sacrifice, and ultimately, its human core.
Rating: 4 / 5
Before the Hunger Games (2012) there was a grossly popular Japanese film by director Kinji Fukasaku called Battle Royale (2000).
Delivered in typical overdramatic Japanese style, Battle Royale is unlike any film known in Western cinema. Fukasaku blends beauty and brutality as we witness the innocence of youth corrupted with the ultimate need for survival, kill or be killed. With a death (or two) in every scene, this rapidly-paced narrative holds the sanctity of life as forfeit for each and every one of its multitudinous characters, who attempt a surprising array of tactics to kill, survive, or thwart the system in which they are trapped. All the social mores and pretensions of junior high school are replaced by love, loyalty, and raw fight-or-flight animal instinct.
The gems in this story are its intelligently characterized inhabitants, especially the teacher-turned-gamesmaster, Kitano-sensei. Through his character we see tragic, jaded adults devouring the lives of unblemished youth, especially the main characters, Shuya Nanahara and Noriko Nakagawa, previously ignorant of the horrors of adulthood and disappointment.
Battle Royale’s plot fails to pursue a few red herrings which warrant further development, although this failure does not hinder the plot much, mostly because their elaboration would impinge on the rigorous pacing of the main story.
Although the over-the-top acting may be a turnoff to some, if you approach Kinji Fukasaku’s Battle Royale with open mind, it may just surprise you with its juxtaposition of tenderness and violence, desperation and sacrifice, and ultimately, its human core.
Rating: 4 / 5
Monday, October 29, 2012
Jiro Dreams of Sushi, a documentary film by David Gelb
Jiro Dreams of Sushi is a
small film, minimalist in every respect.
Tender, intimate, and honest, this documentary demonstrates majestic simplicity. Crisply shot with the Red One and Canon 7D,
David Gelb ability to capture compact but meaningful cinematic visuals reveals a
subtle storytelling genius. The film’s
flavorful imagery all but places each dish onto your watering tongue. Although Jiro
lacks the polish of a high-budget studio film, raw elements such as the
modest, inconspicuous soundtrack (as minimalist in composition as the movie
itself) work in favor of the film instead of against it.
Superficially, Jiro provides
an insightful cross-section into the alien microcosm of a world-class sushi
chef in Japan and its thematically related orbiting satellites. But on a deeper, more profound level Gelb’s
documentary illuminates the relationships of fathers and sons—and by extension,
masters and apprentices—as universal, transcending both culture and context.
Simple, honest, gorgeous. A
masterful accomplishment for a young filmmaker, worthy of the praise of foodies
and cinephiles alike. Place Jiro Dreams of Sushi on your must-see
list—and then plan on going out for sushi.
Rating: 5 / 5
Sunday, October 21, 2012
Argo, a film by Ben Affleck
By James Gilmore
Ben Affleck’s Argo takes a clumsy script and transforms it into a seat-riveting filmic experience. He and his skillful editors successfully impress artificial tension upon the audience in spite of the script’s many shortcomings. Script problems magnify when translated to the big screen, and such issues become very evident as characters reveal their lives to each other in standalone cutaway scenes that serve no plot purpose. Affleck’s protagonist character, Tony Mendez, is poorly written, making him too weak and impotent in comparison to his fellow cast members.
Ben Affleck’s Argo takes a clumsy script and transforms it into a seat-riveting filmic experience. He and his skillful editors successfully impress artificial tension upon the audience in spite of the script’s many shortcomings. Script problems magnify when translated to the big screen, and such issues become very evident as characters reveal their lives to each other in standalone cutaway scenes that serve no plot purpose. Affleck’s protagonist character, Tony Mendez, is poorly written, making him too weak and impotent in comparison to his fellow cast members.

In short, Ben Affleck should quit acting and direct full-time, but he needs to learn to push the script to a final polish before jumping into making the film itself. With such spectacular directing talent it is a waste to not use equally judicious judgment in finishing the screenplay, as is evident in both Argo and his feature film directorial debut, Gone Baby Gone. Still, audiences eagerly await his next work.
Rating: 3.5 / 5
Monday, October 15, 2012
As I Lay Dying, a literary novel by William Faulkner
As I Lay Dying examines the uncensored inner monologue of family members
experiencing deep grief in what is more aptly titled a work of narrative poetry than literary fiction. Seemingly
written in a single fever-pitch binge, Faulkner’s poignant discourse and
extensive use of symbolism comes to the reader through the enigmatic filter of the
inner mind.
As I Lay Dying warrants close
study and an open mind. It is not for
everyone.
Rating: 4 / 5
Monday, October 8, 2012
1632, an alternative history novel by Eric Flint
By James Gilmore
Eric Flint’s 1632 is an
alternative history science fiction novel about a small town in present day
West Virginia that is suddenly transported back in time to Germany during the
devastating Thirty Years’ War in the year 1632.
At its heart, 1632 is a romantic
view of classic American ideals clashing with and conquering those of the
oppressed, war-torn 17th century continental Europe, pushing normal small town
folk into extraordinary circumstances.
Eric Flint executes the unusual and exceptionally difficult premise
with marvelous ease and methodical reasoning, exploring the promise of the
premise with detailed thoroughness. Despite
reviews which misleadingly describe the book as “action packed” 1632 is mostly a relationship-oriented piece with a
few periods of intense action counterpointed against extended laconic sections of
blossoming romance.
The plentiful characters populating the novel surprise the reader with
their variance, color, and very human likeability, which makes the exploration
their relationships a pleasure, even if the story does get bogged down in a
disproportionate amount of romance during the second act. The large cast prevents great depth in character development. Regardless, it’s obvious to the reader that Flint
is an author who genuinely loves his characters.
One of the greatest shortcomings of 1632
is its failure to live up to the high stakes generated by the premise. Main characters have things pretty easy and rarely
(if ever) actually lose anything of value, while any obstacles that do arise
are circumvented without great difficulty.
Greater challenges and higher stakes conflict are needed in a world where
innumerable dangers lurk in the shadows.
Unfortunately, the dangers threaten but seldom actually emerge from the
periphery.
Eric Flint’s 1632 may be an
acquired taste for most, but don’t hesitate to pick up a copy if you are in the
mood for something new, unique and quasi-historical.
Rating: 3.5 / 5
Monday, October 1, 2012
The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo, a mystery thriller novel by Stieg Larsson ("Quickie" Review)
By James Gilmore
The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo by
Stieg Larsson is an altogether
pleasurable and smooth read, even in spite of the frequent, overly burdensome
exposition and a vast proliferation of details almost too numerous for the
reader to continually to keep in mind, requiring an extra dosage of
concentration while reading.
As for the character of Lisbeth Salander, she is one of the most
fascinating, inescapably magnetic characters in modern fiction, a curiosity or
enigma that sucks us into slavering to learn more about her.
The author Stieg Larsson passed away on November 9, 2004.
Rating: 4 / 5
Tuesday, June 26, 2012
Pirate Latitudes, a novel by Michael Crichton
By James Gilmore

Unfortunately, Pirate Latitudes once again exhibits
Crichton’s two major weaknesses: (1) his talent for gullibly accepting stereotypes (valid or not)
based on his research, and (2) failing to provide any greater depth or meaning
beyond the story itself, which is where the limit of the story’s impact can be
felt most.
A thrilling ride for Crichton and pirate lovers; a guilty pleasure for
lit-heads.
Rating: 3 / 5
Tuesday, June 5, 2012
The Grand Design, by Stephen Hawking
By James Gilmore
It is not my habit to review non-story materials but I thought a brief
experiment might be acceptable.

The Grand Design is yet another book
by the mastermind Stephen
Hawking concerning the makeup of our universe. While a fascinating read, the book spends
almost its entirety on the history of the field which built the foundation for
quantum physics. A Layman’s History of Physics would be a much more apt title. The book only expresses one real opinion
which is made plain at the very end—essentially that M-Theory rocks and
everything else sucks.
Not Hawking’s best. A
tantalizing and thought-provoking read nonetheless.
Rating: 3 / 5
Monday, May 7, 2012
Damned, a novel by Chuck Palahniuk
Damned by Chuck Palahniuk follows
the idea that every cliché you’ve ever heard about Hell is absolutely and
completely true. And Hell isn’t really
that bad of a place so long as you don’t expect it to be like Heaven. All it needs is a little optimism and some long-overdue
re-landscaping by the supernumerous tenants.
The book is creative, thoughtful and entertaining, and is probably more
broadly-appealing to readers than most of Palahniuk’s other, more shockingly
gruesome works. With trim, lean writing
the author creates the most sympathetic, likeable protagonist of his
career. To his credit, the 13-year old
female protagonist is thoroughly authentic in thought and viewpoint, which
allows Palahniuk to lead the character to a number of unusually profound conclusions. Like the protagonist, every member of the
supporting cast is similarly illustrated with sympathetic—if not tragic—human
weaknesses. As the backstories of these characters
are revealed the reader becomes continually haunted with the idea that there is
no Heaven at all, and that Hell is for everyone.
Despite its strengths, Damned is
not Palahniuk’s best. His trademark technique
of using repetition in changing contexts fails to fulfill its purpose in this
novel. The result is frequently negatively
iterative, if not, at times, indulgent.
The structure of the final act is particularly weak as well, giving the
impression that the novel was cut short of the full story the author was trying
to tell. Virtually without warning, we
are ushered to a rapid climax which dissipates anti-climactically. The pivotal idea to the story’s final
revelation—that the main character is driven by free will—is hindered by the
poor structure and ultimately results in invalidating all the story which
preceded it by making it feel pointless.
Damned is worth a read,
especially for those who love anti-fundamentalist and anti-liberal satire.
Rating: 3 / 5
Monday, April 30, 2012
West Bank Story, a "Quickie Review" of the short film by Ari Sandel
by James Gilmore
It’s West Side Story...in the Middle East! West Bank Story is must-see for musical lovers and anyone
looking for a good laugh on the very serious matter of Israeli-Palestinian
tension. Ari Sandel reconstructs
Israeli-Palestinian relations in a microcosm by using two restaurants, one
Israeli, and one Palestinian, who clash as a pair of star-crossed lovers work
to bridge the gap between their bitter rivalry.
In the end, Israelis and Palestinians end up being more alike than different and it is the customers who come first—i.e., the people, not the
conflict.
Rating: 5 / 5
Monday, April 23, 2012
Babbitt, a literary novel by Sinclair Lewis
by James Gilmore
Babbit by Sinclair Lewis is
an all-but-forgotten literary masterpiece which espouses the hollowness of
blind conformism. At the surface, the
novel appears to be about a successful businessman entering (and surviving) a mid-life
crisis. But more accurately, Babbitt is about a man whose identity only
exists by means of his compromising conformity to everyone else. He struggles between being the person everyone
thinks he should be and what he really wants for his own life, although he has
become so entrenched in the conformist society that he cannot escape. In this he discovers that he is weak and
pathetic, a living cliché, a human example of meaningless and futility.
Babbitt is a true character
piece which explores every facet of the completely repressed individual in a
society of demanding conformity. The
text remains engrossing despite constantly straddling the line between thoroughness
and repetitiveness. Unfortunately, reading
the novel can be arduous due to its very slow story development.
Babbitt was internationally successful
at the time it was published while domestically the novel’s brazen but accurate
depictions and accusations of America offended or mystified many readers. Every student of American literature should
study Sinclair’s Babbitt.
Rating: 5 / 5
Monday, April 16, 2012
Shadows and Fog, a film by Woody Allen
“It’s been a strange night,” says the protagonist in Woody Allen’s
film, Shadows and Fog (1991). And a strange night it is.
This surreal tragicomedy features the
bumbling Kleinman (Woody Allen) adrift and directionless in the “shadows and
fog” of life in an existence where everyone else seems to know exactly where
they are going and where death is a nameless killer ever lurking in the shadows. Kleinman is invisible, a
ghost in a world of flesh and a story of coincidence.

Shadows and Fog is an
85-minute metaphor for life in the macroscopic sense. Every scene is a sampling of some form of
human existence, a circus filled with “theories and questions” which masks the
true meaning of humanity.
Ominously looming over the film’s rich qualities are a number of detractors. The film feels coarse and drifting, like the filmmaker
wasn’t satisfied with the end product but resigned not to fix it (or wasn’t
sure how). Scenes of maladroit exposition
and dialogue appear too far into the story to justify their inclusion and are
all too often coupled with less-than-desirable acting and blocky line
deliveries. The episodic nature of the story
serves to confuse more often than engross.
The end result is a film whose pacing ebbs and flags and whose quality
is uneven.
To sum up with a paraphrase from the magician (played by Kenneth Mars):
“People need illusions, like they need air.”
Cinephiles and Woody Allen fans delight, all others take flight.
Rating: 3 / 5
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)