(Although we have a few comments to make regarding the film as a whole the majority of this review will be dedicated to the story’s adaptation from page to screen.)
Gavin Hood’s Ender's Game takes a science fiction classic and visualizes it with dazzling realism and originality. The opening is rough and plagued by hokey dialogue but as the story progresses it gradually comes into its own, culminating in arguably the most breathtaking climactic end battle in all of science fiction to date, although the penultimate battle scenes leading up the climax feel truncated, making the third act feel rushed. Asa Butterfield (the principal lead) delivers a performance that becomes increasingly impressive as the film progresses.
As both writer and director, Hood impressively adapts difficult material to the silver screen, improving notable segments from the book such as the battle school sequence and simulated battles, and correlating Mazer Rackham’s final battle with Ender’s active progress during the course of the main plot.
However, some adaptation decisions were more poorly chosen, such as the near total absence of Ender's older brother, Peter, who features so prominently in terms of theme and character development (for Ender) but is almost completely absent from the film, despite his being referenced often. As written, the character of Peter should have been omitted altogether to prevent unnecessary dilution of the plot. Also the psychologist character whose presence remains strong throughout the story is so poorly written and spouts redundant dialogue and concepts that are not illustrated in the film, especially earlier in the portions. So much more could have been done with the character to both expand and draw out Ender's character but very little is ever utilized. The character ends up as a bloated element of fat filled with hot air.
Ender's Game's greatest weakness is its botched final reveal. By showing an additional point of view (an excellent adaptation choice) the filmmaker expands on the world of the story but presents the new information in a way that prematurely gives away the ending, thereby lessening the potential impact of one of the greatest reveals in science fiction history.
Despite its shortcomings, Ender’s Game is an enjoyable cinematic journey through an original world tantalizing to viewers who are fans of science fiction. Ender’s Game was adapted from the widely known novel of the same name by Orson Scott Card.
Rating: 3.5 / 5
Compact all-encompassing reviews from a storyteller's perspective which examine structure, execution, technical and spectacle in a brief, efficient format.
Showing posts with label feature. Show all posts
Showing posts with label feature. Show all posts
Tuesday, January 28, 2014
Tuesday, November 12, 2013
Star Trek: Into Darkness, a film by J.J. Abrams
J.J. Abrams’s long anticipated sequel Star Trek: Into Darkness outdoes its predecessor in action, intensity and spectacle. Despite a running time of 2:12 (132 min) the film feels a little too short to play out the struggle between the protagonists and the main antagonist, played by Benedict Cumberbatch. The saturation of fan service and cross-references to other events in the Star Trek universe is an unending treat for fans of the franchise but at times detrimental, especially when it results in lines of hokey dialogue. A simple substitution of one of the film’s mindless action scenes for a short sequence to deepen character and theme development would have greatly benefited Into Darkness.
The first Star Trek took us with surprise by the acting intensity portrayed by its young cast. Into Darkness retains the same cast but fails to carry over the compelling emotional punch from its prequel. Part of this failure results from the from the disappointing script characterization of several cast members, namely Kirk, Spock, and Uhura. Benedict Cumberbatch proves the exception to this rule in his portrayal of the notorious Khan.
The biggest issue in Into Darkness is with the main antagonist, Khan. As one of the most intelligent and complex characters in the Star Trek Universe, more story and screen time oriented toward exploring the character’s intricacies is required in order for his personal journey to feel complete by the conclusion of his story arc. Instead of actually exploring the character, the story turns him into a 1-dimensional foe with no further development beyond the mid-point—a sad misappropriation of story potential. Much more could have been made of his shifting ally/enemy role as well but the film took the easy way out with his character, thereby losing both strength and depth as a result.
One of the most exciting films of the 2010s.
Rating: 3.5 / 5

The biggest issue in Into Darkness is with the main antagonist, Khan. As one of the most intelligent and complex characters in the Star Trek Universe, more story and screen time oriented toward exploring the character’s intricacies is required in order for his personal journey to feel complete by the conclusion of his story arc. Instead of actually exploring the character, the story turns him into a 1-dimensional foe with no further development beyond the mid-point—a sad misappropriation of story potential. Much more could have been made of his shifting ally/enemy role as well but the film took the easy way out with his character, thereby losing both strength and depth as a result.
One of the most exciting films of the 2010s.
Rating: 3.5 / 5
Thursday, May 16, 2013
Suspiria, a horror film by Dario Argento
Dario Argento’s classic Suspiria is one of the highlights from the golden age of the 1970s horror genre.
Intense in every sense of the word, Argento’s film is violent, visually vibrant and surreal with an alarmingly ear-grating soundtrack intentionally designed to set the audience’s nerves on edge. Be prepared for an experience that is both oddly immersive and abrasive to the senses.
The lighting, set design and shot composition are more the stars of this film than the doe-eyed lead, played by Jessica Harper, who merely drifts from one scene to the next as if led by an invisible hand.
The film’s vibrant visuals are just enough to counterbalance a feeble, sometimes nonsensical story and nonexistent character development. Some of its colorful dream-like qualities and childish dialogue make more sense when the viewer understands that portions of the film were inspired by the dreams of co-writer Daria Nicolodi, and that the script originally intended for the protagonist and her classmates to be no older than 12, but neither excuse a weak story.
Suspiria is a stunning film like no other, so be sure to put it in your canon of “must-sees” for cinematographers, art designers, filmmakers and horror buffs alongside other visually salient works like Roman Polanski’s Repulsion.
Rating: 3 / 5
Intense in every sense of the word, Argento’s film is violent, visually vibrant and surreal with an alarmingly ear-grating soundtrack intentionally designed to set the audience’s nerves on edge. Be prepared for an experience that is both oddly immersive and abrasive to the senses.

The film’s vibrant visuals are just enough to counterbalance a feeble, sometimes nonsensical story and nonexistent character development. Some of its colorful dream-like qualities and childish dialogue make more sense when the viewer understands that portions of the film were inspired by the dreams of co-writer Daria Nicolodi, and that the script originally intended for the protagonist and her classmates to be no older than 12, but neither excuse a weak story.
Suspiria is a stunning film like no other, so be sure to put it in your canon of “must-sees” for cinematographers, art designers, filmmakers and horror buffs alongside other visually salient works like Roman Polanski’s Repulsion.
Rating: 3 / 5
Monday, March 4, 2013
Get the Gringo, a film by Adrian Grunberg
By James Gilmore
Adrian Grunberg’s gritty tough-guy film, Get the Gringo, is a wry tongue-in-cheek action crime drama with an edgy but resourceful troublemaker for a protagonist. He is proactive and refreshingly clever, a guy who only looks out for himself in world where everyone is corrupt and everyone is out to get him.
Colorful in texture, tone and visuals, Gringo creates a palatable experience for the audience free from the dictatorial confines of the mainstream Hollywood studio system, as is evident in some of its more taboo elements and several touches of brutal violence. Characters grow out of the naturally developing, organic plotline and are inseparable from this well-told story.
Some viewers may find parts of the third act low on the believability scale but overall Gringo’s storytelling flaws are minimal.
Although the film may not aspire to deep philosophical pondering the film fulfills its goal as a solid piece of entertainment. If you are in the mood for a Friday night flick that is refreshing, stimulating and all-around entertaining, give Get the Gringo a try.
Rating: 3.5 / 5
Adrian Grunberg’s gritty tough-guy film, Get the Gringo, is a wry tongue-in-cheek action crime drama with an edgy but resourceful troublemaker for a protagonist. He is proactive and refreshingly clever, a guy who only looks out for himself in world where everyone is corrupt and everyone is out to get him.
Colorful in texture, tone and visuals, Gringo creates a palatable experience for the audience free from the dictatorial confines of the mainstream Hollywood studio system, as is evident in some of its more taboo elements and several touches of brutal violence. Characters grow out of the naturally developing, organic plotline and are inseparable from this well-told story.
Some viewers may find parts of the third act low on the believability scale but overall Gringo’s storytelling flaws are minimal.
Although the film may not aspire to deep philosophical pondering the film fulfills its goal as a solid piece of entertainment. If you are in the mood for a Friday night flick that is refreshing, stimulating and all-around entertaining, give Get the Gringo a try.
Rating: 3.5 / 5
Monday, February 18, 2013
The Last Airbender, a film by M. Night Shyamalan
by James Gilmore
M. Night Shyamalan’s The Last Airbender is nothing short of a fiasco. Watching Airbender is like watching a group of kids play make believe on a $150m budget. Of its scant virtues are a solid midpoint with an interesting twist and beautiful cinematic scenery, neither of which are enough to save this film from ridicule and oblivion.
The plot is a series of anticlimactic events wherein few sources of conflict come to a head in a do-or-die confrontation. The acting lacks any sense of urgency, even at the most critical of moments, and most of the characters appear to have only a narrow range of emotions, most of which consist of being at the brink of bursting into tears at any given moment. Further exacerbating the problem, awkward, immature dialogue is almost exclusively expository and devoid of subtext, castrating every scene of any potential emotional fortitude. Although targeted to a younger audience this does not give the filmmaker an excuse to leave out basic elements of storytelling (contrast Airbender to any Pixar film and one can see the difference is not so much a disparity as a black gaping chasm).
For a director incapable of creating fast-moving action sequences to take on an action film is certainly laudable as a challenge to Night’s filmmaking abilities, but unfortunately the result is an abysmally failed experiment. While is directorial skills remain unquestioned, he should stop writing his own material and stay away from action-oriented films as his own style caters much better to the slow-moving sequences of his earlier works.
Perhaps the most fatal flaw of Airbender is its repeated penchant for “telling” the audience about the world of the film and hardly ever “showing” it. Most of the story is revealed through expository dialogue instead of showing the audience through visual imagery. He takes “show, don’t tell” to the polar opposite, telling the audience about the movie instead of actually illustrating it for us. The oddity is so extreme that one might think there wasn’t enough time/money to finish shooting these sequences, as in the climactic battle of the classical sword-and-sandal epic Cleopatra.
Through his restrained intensity and confident subtlety, Aasif Mandvi is the acting highlight of the film and just about the only positive element in it.
M. Night Shyamalan’s The Last Airbender is a fantasy epic that falls far short of its grandiose aspirations, ultimately coming across as a very expensive B movie (like his previous film, The Happening). It’s safe to say that we won’t be expecting any blood-pumping thrillers or teen heartthrob sensations out of Shyamalan anytime soon—or ever.
Rating: 1.5 / 5
M. Night Shyamalan’s The Last Airbender is nothing short of a fiasco. Watching Airbender is like watching a group of kids play make believe on a $150m budget. Of its scant virtues are a solid midpoint with an interesting twist and beautiful cinematic scenery, neither of which are enough to save this film from ridicule and oblivion.
The plot is a series of anticlimactic events wherein few sources of conflict come to a head in a do-or-die confrontation. The acting lacks any sense of urgency, even at the most critical of moments, and most of the characters appear to have only a narrow range of emotions, most of which consist of being at the brink of bursting into tears at any given moment. Further exacerbating the problem, awkward, immature dialogue is almost exclusively expository and devoid of subtext, castrating every scene of any potential emotional fortitude. Although targeted to a younger audience this does not give the filmmaker an excuse to leave out basic elements of storytelling (contrast Airbender to any Pixar film and one can see the difference is not so much a disparity as a black gaping chasm).
For a director incapable of creating fast-moving action sequences to take on an action film is certainly laudable as a challenge to Night’s filmmaking abilities, but unfortunately the result is an abysmally failed experiment. While is directorial skills remain unquestioned, he should stop writing his own material and stay away from action-oriented films as his own style caters much better to the slow-moving sequences of his earlier works.
Perhaps the most fatal flaw of Airbender is its repeated penchant for “telling” the audience about the world of the film and hardly ever “showing” it. Most of the story is revealed through expository dialogue instead of showing the audience through visual imagery. He takes “show, don’t tell” to the polar opposite, telling the audience about the movie instead of actually illustrating it for us. The oddity is so extreme that one might think there wasn’t enough time/money to finish shooting these sequences, as in the climactic battle of the classical sword-and-sandal epic Cleopatra.
Through his restrained intensity and confident subtlety, Aasif Mandvi is the acting highlight of the film and just about the only positive element in it.
M. Night Shyamalan’s The Last Airbender is a fantasy epic that falls far short of its grandiose aspirations, ultimately coming across as a very expensive B movie (like his previous film, The Happening). It’s safe to say that we won’t be expecting any blood-pumping thrillers or teen heartthrob sensations out of Shyamalan anytime soon—or ever.
Rating: 1.5 / 5
Monday, February 11, 2013
Ichi the Killer, a film by Takashi Miike
By James Gilmore
From the director of 13 Assassins comes Ichi the Killer, a gruesome but creative narrative that challenges the senses with its pushing of sex and violence to the extreme in an orgy of gore (a “gore-gy” if you will). (Ichi is banned in several countries for its “high impact violence and graphic depictions of cruelty”[Wikipedia].)
Although listed as an action/comedy/crime film imdb.com, Ichi may feel more like torture porn than anything else to regular movie-going audiences. Its surreal, creative departure from typical gore flicks is intriguing, enhanced by a unique soundtrack, thoughtful acting, and a deceptively simple plot which takes on new depth at the midpoint.
Ichi’s tortured main character is furnished with the uncanny ability to paint any room with a smorgasbord of blood and guts. A sexual dysfunctionary, this weak-minded assassin is the victim of manipulative bullies who push him to avenge a non-existent incident from his past. And while the film plays out as a visual dissertation on sadomasochism, the story is actually about bullying and bullies who, as adults, are fighting for survival among the fiercest criminals of the Shinjuku underworld. The protagonist manages to purge the screen of its many villains in a disappointingly anti-climactic conclusion.
Although it may be the most light-hearted torture porn ever made, Ichi the Killer is not for the faint of heart. Anyone expecting innocent laughs, seat-riveting action or a good old fashioned crime story should avert their eyes and ears and move on to something else. File Ichi in the “most gruesome films of world cinema” category, right next to Salo.
Rating: 3 / 5
Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Act of Valor, a film by Mike McCoy and Scott Waugh
By James Gilmore
Act of Valor is a ballad of the unsung heroic deeds of Navy SEALs in clandestine operations.
Although neatly structured the film feels less like a coherent story than a series of military reenactments with a few specks of story spliced in between action sequences. Valor is generously laden with fan service for military aficionados, but at times the ultra realistic use of military jargon crosses the line from necessity to extraneous masturbation. Action sequences deliver impressive intensity and speed while skillful POV camerawork immerses the audience inside each mission, lending a sort of video game feel to the advancement of the plot.
The acting is as wooden as it gets and not just in terms of line delivery—no surprise, considering the principal characters are played by real Navy SEALs and not professional actors. Unfortunately this means that emotional tangibility with the main characters is difficult to establish, even with the repeated use of artificial filmic constructs employed to build personal empathy.
Actor Jason Cottle’s uncanny intensity makes his performance stand out among the cast.
If Act of Valor teaches us anything, it’s that “actual” does not equal “dramatic.” For a stellar example of how dramatizing reality improves its filmic qualities, see Seal Team Six: The Raid on Osama bin Laden. In spite of its painful dialogue and feeble plot, Act of Valor is a realistic, tense experience that military and action enthusiasts will love.
Rating: 3 / 5
Act of Valor is a ballad of the unsung heroic deeds of Navy SEALs in clandestine operations.
Although neatly structured the film feels less like a coherent story than a series of military reenactments with a few specks of story spliced in between action sequences. Valor is generously laden with fan service for military aficionados, but at times the ultra realistic use of military jargon crosses the line from necessity to extraneous masturbation. Action sequences deliver impressive intensity and speed while skillful POV camerawork immerses the audience inside each mission, lending a sort of video game feel to the advancement of the plot.
The acting is as wooden as it gets and not just in terms of line delivery—no surprise, considering the principal characters are played by real Navy SEALs and not professional actors. Unfortunately this means that emotional tangibility with the main characters is difficult to establish, even with the repeated use of artificial filmic constructs employed to build personal empathy.
Actor Jason Cottle’s uncanny intensity makes his performance stand out among the cast.
If Act of Valor teaches us anything, it’s that “actual” does not equal “dramatic.” For a stellar example of how dramatizing reality improves its filmic qualities, see Seal Team Six: The Raid on Osama bin Laden. In spite of its painful dialogue and feeble plot, Act of Valor is a realistic, tense experience that military and action enthusiasts will love.
Rating: 3 / 5
Monday, November 26, 2012
Series 7: The Contenders, a film by Daniel Minahan
by James Gilmore
Before the Hunger Games (2012) there was a grossly popular Japanese film by director Kinji Fukasaku called Battle Royale (2000), and there was today’s subject, an obscure little film called Series 7: The Contenders (2001) by Daniel Minahan.
The story is short and efficient, confronting head-on a two-pronged theme: that the American public’s insatiable lust for entertainment and the media’s unscrupulous push for ratings could ultimately lead to the sacrifice humanity itself. Minahan drives home his point with merciless precision by employing a faux unscripted format which so closely resembles the genuine article that one wonders if such an inhumane entertainment is not too far off, if our “advanced” civilization has deteriorated to the point of reviving Roman gladiatorial bloodsports just to keep audiences entertained. Or perhaps Minahan is saying that reality television as it is now is an emotional battle royale in which there can be only one survivor.
Character lies at the heart of the script. Plot twists usually occur in the form of character reveals, and everyone in The Contenders hides aces up their sleeves. Even the most unassuming combatant will surprise you more than once.
Viewers may recognize the star of the film, Brooke Smith, whose prior work include roles in Grey’s Anatomy and The Silence of the Lambs.
Daniel Minahan’s Series 7: The Contenders is a complete surprise and a must see, an impressive low-budget film worthy of its stock. Available on streaming at Netflix.com.
Rating: 4 / 5
Before the Hunger Games (2012) there was a grossly popular Japanese film by director Kinji Fukasaku called Battle Royale (2000), and there was today’s subject, an obscure little film called Series 7: The Contenders (2001) by Daniel Minahan.
Based on his experiences working in reality TV, Minahan exploits his intimate knowledge of reality television to accost that hypocritical world with scathing ridicule. In this deadly serious mockumentary, Minahan takes us through highlights from the seventh season of a fake hit reality series called “The Contenders” in which a group of individuals are selected at random to compete in an anything-goes deathmatch. Think of Series 7 as the Roman gladiatorial games meets reality television.
The story is short and efficient, confronting head-on a two-pronged theme: that the American public’s insatiable lust for entertainment and the media’s unscrupulous push for ratings could ultimately lead to the sacrifice humanity itself. Minahan drives home his point with merciless precision by employing a faux unscripted format which so closely resembles the genuine article that one wonders if such an inhumane entertainment is not too far off, if our “advanced” civilization has deteriorated to the point of reviving Roman gladiatorial bloodsports just to keep audiences entertained. Or perhaps Minahan is saying that reality television as it is now is an emotional battle royale in which there can be only one survivor.
Character lies at the heart of the script. Plot twists usually occur in the form of character reveals, and everyone in The Contenders hides aces up their sleeves. Even the most unassuming combatant will surprise you more than once.
Viewers may recognize the star of the film, Brooke Smith, whose prior work include roles in Grey’s Anatomy and The Silence of the Lambs.
Daniel Minahan’s Series 7: The Contenders is a complete surprise and a must see, an impressive low-budget film worthy of its stock. Available on streaming at Netflix.com.
Rating: 4 / 5
Friday, November 16, 2012
Battle Royale, a film by Kinji Fukasaku
by James Gilmore
Before the Hunger Games (2012) there was a grossly popular Japanese film by director Kinji Fukasaku called Battle Royale (2000).
Delivered in typical overdramatic Japanese style, Battle Royale is unlike any film known in Western cinema. Fukasaku blends beauty and brutality as we witness the innocence of youth corrupted with the ultimate need for survival, kill or be killed. With a death (or two) in every scene, this rapidly-paced narrative holds the sanctity of life as forfeit for each and every one of its multitudinous characters, who attempt a surprising array of tactics to kill, survive, or thwart the system in which they are trapped. All the social mores and pretensions of junior high school are replaced by love, loyalty, and raw fight-or-flight animal instinct.
The gems in this story are its intelligently characterized inhabitants, especially the teacher-turned-gamesmaster, Kitano-sensei. Through his character we see tragic, jaded adults devouring the lives of unblemished youth, especially the main characters, Shuya Nanahara and Noriko Nakagawa, previously ignorant of the horrors of adulthood and disappointment.
Battle Royale’s plot fails to pursue a few red herrings which warrant further development, although this failure does not hinder the plot much, mostly because their elaboration would impinge on the rigorous pacing of the main story.
Although the over-the-top acting may be a turnoff to some, if you approach Kinji Fukasaku’s Battle Royale with open mind, it may just surprise you with its juxtaposition of tenderness and violence, desperation and sacrifice, and ultimately, its human core.
Rating: 4 / 5
Before the Hunger Games (2012) there was a grossly popular Japanese film by director Kinji Fukasaku called Battle Royale (2000).
Delivered in typical overdramatic Japanese style, Battle Royale is unlike any film known in Western cinema. Fukasaku blends beauty and brutality as we witness the innocence of youth corrupted with the ultimate need for survival, kill or be killed. With a death (or two) in every scene, this rapidly-paced narrative holds the sanctity of life as forfeit for each and every one of its multitudinous characters, who attempt a surprising array of tactics to kill, survive, or thwart the system in which they are trapped. All the social mores and pretensions of junior high school are replaced by love, loyalty, and raw fight-or-flight animal instinct.
The gems in this story are its intelligently characterized inhabitants, especially the teacher-turned-gamesmaster, Kitano-sensei. Through his character we see tragic, jaded adults devouring the lives of unblemished youth, especially the main characters, Shuya Nanahara and Noriko Nakagawa, previously ignorant of the horrors of adulthood and disappointment.
Battle Royale’s plot fails to pursue a few red herrings which warrant further development, although this failure does not hinder the plot much, mostly because their elaboration would impinge on the rigorous pacing of the main story.
Although the over-the-top acting may be a turnoff to some, if you approach Kinji Fukasaku’s Battle Royale with open mind, it may just surprise you with its juxtaposition of tenderness and violence, desperation and sacrifice, and ultimately, its human core.
Rating: 4 / 5
Wednesday, November 7, 2012
Super 8, a film by J.J. Abrams
by James Gilmore
Super 8: think The Goonies with a touch of Cloverfield flavoring. A modernized 1940s pulp brought to life in the style of 1980s family adventure movies, watching Super 8 is in many ways like reliving the nostalgic childhood you never had.
While the ambiance is an undeniable factor in drawing the audience into the world of the story, what really sells the film is the remarkable chemistry within the cast. In no small feat, Abrams manages to garner authentic performances from his child actors from fade in to fade out.
While character chemistry and ambiance stand out in Super 8, the film is not without its pitfalls. Super 8 lacks the depth of Abrams’ other works, especially in terms of plot, which proves itself to be somewhat thin and predictable, making for a somewhat hollow filmic experience in what could have been a magical one. Nevertheless, parts of the film are memorable, especially the mini film-within-a-film which plays during the end credits.
In spite of its slender plot, Super 8 remains a wholesome thriller that is sure to stand as one of the greatest youth adventure films since The Goonies.
Rating: 4 / 5
Super 8: think The Goonies with a touch of Cloverfield flavoring. A modernized 1940s pulp brought to life in the style of 1980s family adventure movies, watching Super 8 is in many ways like reliving the nostalgic childhood you never had.
While the ambiance is an undeniable factor in drawing the audience into the world of the story, what really sells the film is the remarkable chemistry within the cast. In no small feat, Abrams manages to garner authentic performances from his child actors from fade in to fade out.
While character chemistry and ambiance stand out in Super 8, the film is not without its pitfalls. Super 8 lacks the depth of Abrams’ other works, especially in terms of plot, which proves itself to be somewhat thin and predictable, making for a somewhat hollow filmic experience in what could have been a magical one. Nevertheless, parts of the film are memorable, especially the mini film-within-a-film which plays during the end credits.
In spite of its slender plot, Super 8 remains a wholesome thriller that is sure to stand as one of the greatest youth adventure films since The Goonies.
Rating: 4 / 5
Monday, October 29, 2012
Jiro Dreams of Sushi, a documentary film by David Gelb
Jiro Dreams of Sushi is a
small film, minimalist in every respect.
Tender, intimate, and honest, this documentary demonstrates majestic simplicity. Crisply shot with the Red One and Canon 7D,
David Gelb ability to capture compact but meaningful cinematic visuals reveals a
subtle storytelling genius. The film’s
flavorful imagery all but places each dish onto your watering tongue. Although Jiro
lacks the polish of a high-budget studio film, raw elements such as the
modest, inconspicuous soundtrack (as minimalist in composition as the movie
itself) work in favor of the film instead of against it.
Superficially, Jiro provides
an insightful cross-section into the alien microcosm of a world-class sushi
chef in Japan and its thematically related orbiting satellites. But on a deeper, more profound level Gelb’s
documentary illuminates the relationships of fathers and sons—and by extension,
masters and apprentices—as universal, transcending both culture and context.
Simple, honest, gorgeous. A
masterful accomplishment for a young filmmaker, worthy of the praise of foodies
and cinephiles alike. Place Jiro Dreams of Sushi on your must-see
list—and then plan on going out for sushi.
Rating: 5 / 5
Sunday, October 21, 2012
Argo, a film by Ben Affleck
By James Gilmore
Ben Affleck’s Argo takes a clumsy script and transforms it into a seat-riveting filmic experience. He and his skillful editors successfully impress artificial tension upon the audience in spite of the script’s many shortcomings. Script problems magnify when translated to the big screen, and such issues become very evident as characters reveal their lives to each other in standalone cutaway scenes that serve no plot purpose. Affleck’s protagonist character, Tony Mendez, is poorly written, making him too weak and impotent in comparison to his fellow cast members.
Ben Affleck’s Argo takes a clumsy script and transforms it into a seat-riveting filmic experience. He and his skillful editors successfully impress artificial tension upon the audience in spite of the script’s many shortcomings. Script problems magnify when translated to the big screen, and such issues become very evident as characters reveal their lives to each other in standalone cutaway scenes that serve no plot purpose. Affleck’s protagonist character, Tony Mendez, is poorly written, making him too weak and impotent in comparison to his fellow cast members.

In short, Ben Affleck should quit acting and direct full-time, but he needs to learn to push the script to a final polish before jumping into making the film itself. With such spectacular directing talent it is a waste to not use equally judicious judgment in finishing the screenplay, as is evident in both Argo and his feature film directorial debut, Gone Baby Gone. Still, audiences eagerly await his next work.
Rating: 3.5 / 5
Monday, August 6, 2012
Conan the Barbarian, a film by Marcus Nispel
By James Gilmore
Don’t go into Marcus Nispel’s Conan the Barbarian expecting an expert remake of the 1982 classic by John Milius. You won’t get it.
The 2011 Conan is an action-soaked
bonanza without any pretense at storytelling depth. Nispel bombards our senses through an orgy of
stylization and violence in an attempt to mask its slender content, but no
amount of polished veneer can obscure the shallowness beneath. The storytelling is clumsy and repetitive at
best, hyper-extending itself to stretch a thin 60-minute perfunctory plot over
two painstaking hours in an endless string of action vignettes in which the audience
is whisked through time and space to a number of noncontiguous historical eras.
(Let’s not mention the fact that the acting and poorly written dialogue
are enough to make you want to run for the hills.)
Visually, Conan is a gruesome
mishmash of every other fantasy film ever made, numerous elements being ripped
almost directly out of better, more fulfilling constituents of the genre (which
shall remain unnamed).
As for the character Conan, he is barely a character at all. Employing the oft-overused-in-Hollywood
cliché as his template, this impetuous hot-headed central character is more an
excuse to paste the screen with gore than a true protagonist.
The only accomplishment worth lauding Conan for is the duping of Hollywood into spending $70
million
on what is essentially an expensive-looking B movie. And Hollywood executives wonder why audiences
won’t pay up at the box office to see piles of sugar-coated poo...
(Meanwhile, thousands of excellent scripts waste away on shelves,
unread.)
So if you’re up to stuffing a handful of dollar bills down the garbage
disposal or want to watch actors don ridiculous costumes and douse each other
in fake blood for an evening, pick up a copy of Marcus Nispel’s Conan the Barbarian. If you are a fan of his kitschy horror resume
then you will probably take this bloated little number in stride.
Otherwise, see aforementioned garbage disposal.
Rating: 1.5 / 5
Monday, April 16, 2012
Shadows and Fog, a film by Woody Allen
“It’s been a strange night,” says the protagonist in Woody Allen’s
film, Shadows and Fog (1991). And a strange night it is.
This surreal tragicomedy features the
bumbling Kleinman (Woody Allen) adrift and directionless in the “shadows and
fog” of life in an existence where everyone else seems to know exactly where
they are going and where death is a nameless killer ever lurking in the shadows. Kleinman is invisible, a
ghost in a world of flesh and a story of coincidence.

Shadows and Fog is an
85-minute metaphor for life in the macroscopic sense. Every scene is a sampling of some form of
human existence, a circus filled with “theories and questions” which masks the
true meaning of humanity.
Ominously looming over the film’s rich qualities are a number of detractors. The film feels coarse and drifting, like the filmmaker
wasn’t satisfied with the end product but resigned not to fix it (or wasn’t
sure how). Scenes of maladroit exposition
and dialogue appear too far into the story to justify their inclusion and are
all too often coupled with less-than-desirable acting and blocky line
deliveries. The episodic nature of the story
serves to confuse more often than engross.
The end result is a film whose pacing ebbs and flags and whose quality
is uneven.
To sum up with a paraphrase from the magician (played by Kenneth Mars):
“People need illusions, like they need air.”
Cinephiles and Woody Allen fans delight, all others take flight.
Rating: 3 / 5
Tuesday, February 14, 2012
Exterminating Angels (Les anges exterminateurs), a "Quickie" review of the film by Jean-Claude Brisseau
Exterminating Angels (Les anges
exterminateurs) by Jean-Claude Brisseau should have been a short film. Bloated with too many shenanigans and not
enough story, the film contains all the elements of a deep story but fails to
take the necessary steps required to achieve its goal or to adequately explore
its thematic material. In short, it
doesn’t provide a qualitative, coherent examination of the subject matter.
Not to downplay the surrealism of E.A.,
but many of the film’s elements are completely superfluous while the plot is
not as solid as it needs to be. Instead,
it seems to act as a vehicle to justify extended scenes of sexual indulgence.
Brisseau makes an attempt at unraveling the ambiguity of sexuality and
sexual love, but the result is shallow despite its proposed depth and, if
anything, comes across as simply old-fashioned.
One can’t help but feel like the filmmaker thought he was being clever while
sending a personal message of defiance directed toward his critics. However, the result is incoherent and
superficial.
Rating: 2 / 5
Friday, February 3, 2012
The Trip, a film by Michael Winterbottom
by James Gilmore
The Trip is a comedic film reconstituted from a short-lived improv TV series of the same name, starring Steve Coogan and Rob Brydon as fictional (and sometimes not so fictional) versions of themselves. Off-beat and off-color, this hybrid mockumentary/traditional film narrative delivers comedy that might not be to taste for the general American viewing public. Although presented as a low-key comedy, the film is really a sad coming of middle-age story at heart.
The plot follows a foodie pilgrimage taken by non-foodies, unfolding to reveal the life of an aging, professional actor as he approaches a sort of mid-life crisis. But beneath the façade of this simple story is one man’s journey as he is confronted with the revelation that he hides in a fantasy world and must face the brutal truth about his own life, and in so doing transcend from the idles of youth into the maturity of adulthood. For this the film and especially the direction are commendable. Unfortunately, in part because of its conception and in part due to its nature as an ad-hoc film edited together from a TV series, The Trip fails to deliver a strong story arc, resolution of sub-plots or character relationships. The true core of the film cannot be better illustrated than by Steve Coogan’s line: “It’s not about the destination; it’s about the journey.”
The film’s comedy is both passive-aggressive and extremely understated, often to the point of there being no joke or gag at all, merely subtext and unspoken situation which presents itself as genuinely humorous. Especially entertaining is the continuous battle of dinner table impressions, namely those of Michael Cain and Woody Allen.
Coogan’s acting proves to be one of the most impressive aspects of the film as he demonstrates his chops for more serious roles (not to mention that he won a BAFTA for his acting in The Trip).
Rating: 3 / 5
Monday, January 30, 2012
Zelig, a “Quickie” Review of the film by Woody Allen

Woody Allen’s Zelig is a light-hearted,
tongue-in-cheek mockumentary told through a veritable 1930s-style news reel. Despite being a simple love story at heart,
Allen’s film demonstrates remarkable subtlety of theme about a common man who
expresses his desire to fit in to society by literally adopting the
characteristics of others. Zelig not only entertains, but manages
to expose the desires of every human being through the fantastic journey of one
human chameleon.
Rating: 4 / 5
Wednesday, January 25, 2012
Captain America: The First Avenger, a film by Joe Johnston
by James Gilmore
Captain America: The First
Avenger is the best of the “Avenger” origin movies to date. Although well written and directed, special
recognition is in order for the film’s excellent casting, studded with
marvelous actors and nuanced, layered performances. Hugo Weaving is a delight as always—that is,
until he takes off his mask, at which point he loses his broad range of
subtleties and becomes a mere caricature (as disappointedly expected in the
superhero genre). Chris Evans displays
remarkable flexibility in his transformation into Steve Rogers compared with his
previous performance as the Human Torch in both Fantastic Four films wherein Evans plays a character who could not
be more different. Impressive
performances by Stanley Tucci and Tommy Lee Jones are also unavoidably worth
noting.
Invested into the story is an intelligent journey toward the burgeoning
of Captain America as superhero, playing upon not only the usual choices of
balancing heroism and humanness but also the very idea of Captain America as an
icon of World War II symbolism. Captain
America ends up parodying his future self before actually taking the plunge
into his role as true hero. Few
superhero stories can boast an equally clever step. To cement his role as hero icon of the War,
Captain America also makes the choice to not live to fight another day (in his
own time), but makes the ultimate sacrifice—the mark of a true hero—one few
comic book “super” heroes make, even though the term “hero” implies such a
requisite act in order to receive such a lofty title.
Still, at times the action pushes beyond the realm of believability,
which is further exacerbated by a few sub-par special effects and the obligatory
comic book-like action sequences in the third act (which are always a bit
harder to swallow). Also, one finds the glaring
lack of visual verisimilitude in Steve Rogers’ pre-superhero physique annoying
to the point of distraction while the minions of Hydra appear plagiarized from
an unrelated videogame called Return to
Castle Wolfenstein (2001).
Overall, an enjoyable superhero film with a little something more.
Rating: 4 / 5
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)